04
How we score every fund.
The Third Rock Wealth Score
Every fund on our screener carries a Third Rock Wealth Score — a single number from 0 to 5.
It is not a label our desk hands out; it is the fund’s research composite score, rescaled. Equity, debt, and hybrid funds each run through their own composite, because what makes a debt fund good is not what makes an equity fund good. The five parameters below are not five separate verdicts — they are that one composite, broken into its parts, so you can see exactly what drove the number.
No fund pays to be scored.
The score is recomputed every month.
Performance
How well a fund has been rewarded for the risk it took. For an equity fund, that is sustained outperformance of its benchmark across a full market cycle. For a debt fund, it is risk-adjusted return measured against its peers. Short-term noise is excluded either way.
Risk Management
How a fund protects you when conditions turn. For an equity fund, that is how little of a market fall it captures, and how much room it has left before size starts to work against it. For a debt fund, it is the credit quality of what it holds. A fund built to lose less scores higher.
Consistency
Whether a fund does what it is meant to, again and again. For an equity fund, that means beating its benchmark across rolling periods — not winning once. For a debt fund, it means holding to its duration mandate; for a hybrid fund, holding to its equity-allocation mandate. Consistency is staying in character.
Manager Quality
How long the current manager has run the scheme — so the track record you are evaluating belongs to the person still managing the money. This carries real weight for an equity fund. For debt and hybrid funds, where a defined mandate matters more than any one manager, it is a deliberately light factor; you may see a low or empty Manager Quality bar there, and that is by design.
Cost Efficiency
A fund’s expense ratio benchmarked against what’s reasonable for its specific SEBI category. A large-cap fund and a small-cap fund are held to different cost standards because the underlying economics are different.
The five parameters are not added up to make the score — they are the score, separated out. Each one is a fixed share of the same composite our research desk computes, so the five bars always reconcile to the number above them. Every input lands in exactly one parameter; nothing is counted twice. Scores are recomputed monthly from the research pipeline, using data from AMFI, scheme documents, and AMC disclosures.
What the score is
A quantitative filter. It tells you which funds clear a measurable bar across five dimensions. Every fund on the screener is scored the same way, and the score updates monthly.
What the score is not
A recommendation. The score does not know your goals, your risk tolerance, your horizon, or your tax situation. A high-scoring fund may not be the right fund for you. That’s what the conversation with your partner is for.
Finalised clients see additional depth in the gated dashboard: benchmark-consistency analysis and the full research view.